Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2576587 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:35:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 27659 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2003 02:34:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([65.73.33.245]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 12 Sep 2003 02:34:56 -0000 Message-ID: <3F61232A.9BE11DC7@frontiernet.net> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:36:42 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: turbo wastegate requirements References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... That ambient pressure outside certainly needs to be accounted for ...> OTOH, the back-and-forth between Rusty and I and others seems to indicate that 5 or 6 psi (or 10-12 in Hg) is all the boost anyone will reasonably need. So a popoff valve set for 5 psi and forgotten would allow us to take off with 35" (in the unlikely event we needed that much power) and turbo normalize to 15 k ft so it would seem that a really dumb popoff valve would work OK. Just a theory .... Jim S. -- Jim Sower Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T Marvin Kaye wrote: > Jim Sower wrote: > > >>>The pressure trying to OPEN the valve is MAP applied against the inside face > of > the valve. The pressure trying to CLOSE the valve is spring tension PLUS > ambient > pressure applied on the outside face of the valve. > > You will have to somehow compensate for the ambient pressure outside the valve > <<< > > You're absolutely right. Shortly after I hit the send button I realized the > folly of my ways . That ambient pressure outside certainly needs to be > accounted for. Back to the drawing board. > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html