|
|
Hans,
that's what I thought first, will all his discussion about AOL and one or
the other, but as I don't have ANYTHING with AOL (hell I even wrote it with
asterics and spaces, so his probably installed filter wouldn't kill my
message). I am on C&W (Cable&Wireless) in a different country, no filters,
plenty of space, hardly ever bounces ( and if so it advices when and what
was bounced and why), never an ACRE-email.......
I asked other list members to forward that I don't get his list-mail.
I went to him via his website ---- nothing.
You would think that a grown-up, intelligent (obviously he is not stupid,
just acts weird at times...) man, would have the courtesy and guts to tell
you WHY you are off!!
If it was for PC/ISP trouble I could fix it, but if I don't know WHY what
can I do?
Never mind by now I am just curious WHY, I had it with his list - all the
good stuff shows up here (FlyRotary) anyway + the good stuff "he"
condemns/edits/proofreads/inquisitions!
Thomas J.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans Conser" <hansconser@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:35 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication
I have a theory that not all people that think they were banned were
actually banned... Some may be removed due to email bounces...
On Dec 7, 2005, at 6:54 PM, Charlie England wrote:
> Ed's right; people should be able to have knock down, drag out
> disagreements about the subject at hand & even tolerate abuse in the
> interest of advancing the knowledge base, then sit down & eat a meal
> or have a drink together. Ed and I can certify that this is possible,
> right Ed?
>
> Censorship, personal attacks, banishing members outright because they
> disagree with your position, etc all work counter to the purpose of
> these lists & make this hobby more dangerous because peer review is
> effectively killed.
>
> I suspect that you would be shocked if you could see a head count of
> all the people on this list who have been involuntarily banned from
> the other list.
>
> You might be right about this particular banishment, but based on
> statistical odds, my money is on the other guy's version.
>
> Charlie
> banned 2003 (I think)
>
> Ed Anderson wrote:
>
>> You may be right, Jerry. But, its not only what is communicated
>> that's important but how its communicated that can make a difference.
>> Especially using e mails as the conduct.
>> In any case, derogatory comments and/or abusive language from
>> "adults" is unexceptable behavior in most company. Don't know if it
>> happened in this case, but I know it happens, because I've been on
>> the receiving end. Ed A
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Jerry Hey <mailto:jerryhey@earthlink.net>
>> To: Rotary motors in aircraft <mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:37 PM
>> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication
>>
>> Remember that you have only heard one person's version, I know
>> the entire history and think Paul Lamar was being very helpful to
>> Bill. Sometimes when the facts are not what we hoped, anger is
>> the response. Bill is free to do what he wants but he got good
>> advice from Paul Lamar that he should consider once he has had
>> time to cool down.
>> This is my first and last comment on this issue. Jerry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:15 PM, wrjjrs@aol.com <mailto:wrjjrs@aol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just your opinion, but I like it!
>>> Bill Jepson
>>> Too bad, he can be a nice and personable fellow when not
>>> threatened.
>>> Just my opinion of course, not a trained psychiatrist,
>>> although I
>>> did sleep at a Holiday Inn once or twice.
>>> Ed A
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
>
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|
|