X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 867623 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:46:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.116; envelope-from=micallahan@worldnet.att.net Received: from unknown (13.birmingham-04-05rs.al.dial-access.att.net[12.74.163.13]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2005120802402311200297h7e>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 02:40:25 +0000 Message-ID: <003e01c5fba0$482bdb20$0da34a0c@unknown> From: "Michael D. Callahan" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:37:03 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 I wasn't banned, I told him to go screw himself after having a couple of posts that didn't toe the party line edited. Lamar is an ass. You would think such an expert would have SOMETHING flying.... Mike C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlie England" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:54 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication > Ed's right; people should be able to have knock down, drag out > disagreements about the subject at hand & even tolerate abuse in the > interest of advancing the knowledge base, then sit down & eat a meal or > have a drink together. Ed and I can certify that this is possible, right Ed? > > Censorship, personal attacks, banishing members outright because they > disagree with your position, etc all work counter to the purpose of > these lists & make this hobby more dangerous because peer review is > effectively killed. > > I suspect that you would be shocked if you could see a head count of > all the people on this list who have been involuntarily banned from the > other list. > > You might be right about this particular banishment, but based on > statistical odds, my money is on the other guy's version. > > Charlie > banned 2003 (I think) > > Ed Anderson wrote: > > > You may be right, Jerry. But, its not only what is communicated > > that's important but how its communicated that can make a difference. > > Especially using e mails as the conduct. > > In any case, derogatory comments and/or abusive language from > > "adults" is unexceptable behavior in most company. Don't know if it > > happened in this case, but I know it happens, because I've been on > > the receiving end. > > > > Ed A > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Jerry Hey > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:37 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication > > > > Remember that you have only heard one person's version, I know > > the entire history and think Paul Lamar was being very helpful to > > Bill. Sometimes when the facts are not what we hoped, anger is > > the response. Bill is free to do what he wants but he got good > > advice from Paul Lamar that he should consider once he has had > > time to cool down. > > This is my first and last comment on this issue. Jerry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 7, 2005, at 4:15 PM, wrjjrs@aol.com > > wrote: > > > >> Just your opinion, but I like it! > >> Bill Jepson > >> > >> Too bad, he can be a nice and personable fellow when not threatened. > >> > >> Just my opinion of course, not a trained psychiatrist, although I > >> did sleep at a Holiday Inn once or twice. > >> > >> Ed A > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/