X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwest-email1.mdeinc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 867555 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:52:52 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.52.245.18; envelope-from=wschertz@ispwest.com Received: from 7n7z201 (4Cust3.VR1.CHI6.broadband.uu.net [63.13.186.3]) by ispwest-email1.mdeinc.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.2.425.16) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:52:01 -0800 X-Modus-ReverseDNS: OK X-Modus-BlackList: 63.13.186.3=OK;wschertz@ispwest.com=OK X-Modus-RBL: 63.13.186.3=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 63.13.186.3=NO Message-ID: <020b01c5fb99$af22f900$0400000a@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:49:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0206_01C5FB67.613D0780" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C5FB67.613D0780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, I am still on the list, I was just observing that Bill Bradberry's = recent exchanges with Paul were on the subject of the motor mount.=20 By the way, I don't refer to it as the "Schertz" beam. Just made one for = myself and it took on a life of its own! Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser # 4045 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: wrjjrs@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:57 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication You got banned Bill? I am amazed that the people who contribute the most through the site = seem to be the ones excommunicated! The front mount layout will be of = great help to us all, though as I'm sure you know it isn't the ONLY way! Bill Jepson =20 -----Original Message----- From: William To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:07:45 -0600 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication I would guess (based on the traffic I saw) that it is because he = decided to use a sandwich plate motor mount, rather than a beam mount = with the rear mount being welded to the oil pan.=20 Bill Schertz=20 KIS Cruiser # 4045=20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gietzen" =20 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =20 Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:24 AM=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication=20 =20 >=20 > The "Pope" has spoken. Apparently I impuned his design. That is not=20 > allowed!=20 > -------------=20 > Bill;=20 >=20 > Just curious - what was it you said that he disagreed with; or do = you > know?=20 >=20 > Al=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ =20 --=20 Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C5FB67.613D0780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, I am still on the list, I was just = observing=20 that Bill Bradberry's recent exchanges with Paul were on the subject of = the=20 motor mount.
 
By the way, I don't refer to it as the = "Schertz"=20 beam. Just made one for myself and it took on a life of its = own!
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 wrjjrs@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, = 2005 12:57=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Another=20 Excommunication

You got banned Bill?
I am amazed that the people who contribute the most through the = site seem=20 to be the ones excommunicated! The front mount layout will be of great = help to=20 us all, though as I'm sure you know it isn't the ONLY way!
Bill Jepson
 
-----Original Message-----
From: = William=20 <wschertz@ispwest.com>
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: = Wed, 7=20 Dec 2005 09:07:45 -0600
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another=20 Excommunication

I would guess = (based on=20 the traffic I saw) that it is because he decided to use a sandwich = plate motor=20 mount, rather than a beam mount with the rear mount being welded to = the oil=20 pan. 
Bill Schertz 
KIS Cruiser # 4045 
----- = Original=20 Message ----- From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net> 
= To:=20 "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net= > 
Sent:=20 Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:24 AM 
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Another=20 Excommunication 
 
> 
> The "Pope" has = spoken.=20 Apparently I impuned his design. That is not 
>=20 allowed! 
> ------------- 
>=20 Bill; 
> 
> Just curious - what was it you said = that he=20 disagreed with; or do you > know? 
> 
>=20 Al 
> 
> 
> -- 
> = Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ 
> Archive = and UnSub:=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/=20  
-- 
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ 
Archive and = UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ <= BR>
------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C5FB67.613D0780--