X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.240] (HELO priv-edtnes29.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 860158 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:26:07 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.240; envelope-from=haywire@telus.net Received: from Endurance ([154.20.245.217]) by priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20051202081057.CHCI20791.priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net@Endurance> for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:10:57 -0700 From: "Todd Bartrim" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Max static with an IVO? Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:10:33 -0800 Message-ID: <018a01c5f717$df277260$0101a8c0@Endurance> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018B_01C5F6D4.D1043260" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_018B_01C5F6D4.D1043260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm using the IVO up here in Canada, eh, but while I'd sure like to switch to the larger pitch for some better top end performance, I'm still using the 30"-90" pitch. I have great climb performance but am certainly limited in cruise. The test you may be thinking of was actually on a Subaru powered RV6 in Calgary and can be read here http://www.sdsefi.com/rv13.htm Todd I was referencing a report from someone in Canada using a rotary and switching to the larger pitch but I don't remember the details or if it was a good test. Wendell Wendell, It has been reported that the original (lower pitch) IVO props were limited in cruise to below 200MPH. ------=_NextPart_000_018B_01C5F6D4.D1043260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm=20 using the IVO up here in Canada, eh, but while I'd sure like to switch = to the=20 larger pitch for some better top end performance, I'm still using the = 30"-90"=20 pitch. I have great climb performance but am certainly limited in = cruise.=20

The test you may be thinking of was actually = on a=20 Subaru powered RV6 in Calgary and can be read here http://www.sdsefi.com/rv13.htm

Todd

I was=20 referencing a report from someone in Canada using a rotary and = switching to=20 the larger pitch but I don't remember the details or if it was a good=20 test.

Wendell

Wendell,

It has been reported that the original (lower pitch) IVO props = were=20 limited in

cruise to below = 200MPH.

------=_NextPart_000_018B_01C5F6D4.D1043260--