Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #27382
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Shady Bend / economy test
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:15:12 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Glad to hear that everyone had a good time, Laura & I were honored that you all came that far to be here.  Already looking forward to next year!
 
Just have to comment on some test results that seem to be a "free lunch" in the fuel economy area.   Some of you may recall that I see only a small reduction in fuel burn on the Renesis compared to the earlier 13B.  The biggest change is at low throttle, like at idle and taxi power settings where it really does not matter much (usually). 
 
Yesterday on a mental health flight, I was slowly descending at a power setting too low to maintain level flight (about 3100 rpm burning about 1.5 GPH) and was grinning at the MPG readout on the EM2 which was showing about 55 MPG.  The best I can manage in level flight is around 30 MPG.  VSI was showing 200 FPM down so it took 5 minutes to descend 1000 ft.  I started thinking about the time it took to climb 1000 ft and wondered about what the MPG was in climb since I don't usually pay much attention to that.  I setup a moderate climb power setting but instead of setting up best power mixture I set it fairly lean to minimize fuel burn instead of maximizing climb rate.  At 9.5 GPH and 100 MPH I was climbing at 1500 fpm and getting 10.5 MPG.  It took 40 seconds to climb 1000 feet.   Hmmm, I thought,  what is the average MPG if I get 10.5 MPG for 40 seconds and 55 MPG for the next 5 minutes?   I think the answer is around 48 MPG but that seems to be too good to be true.  Seems like some one would have used this technique long ago if it would give a 60% increase in fuel economy.  The error in the EM2 fuel flow readout may be higher at this low flow but nothing like 60%.  Any math majors out there see a flaw in my math or logic?   Or maybe I was in a giant thermal at the time?  I repeated the test twice so I don't think so.
 
The only down side is that I had to fly relatively slow to get these results (95 - 100 mph) but a 60% increase in fuel economy sure could be handy in some situations.   This test was at 1000 - 2000 feet so I'll have to see if it holds true at higher altitudes.
 
Tracy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:26 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Shady Bend

As always, it was 'worth the drive'. Had an enjoyable trip down with
Kelly, Monty & Ken on Thursday.  As you can tell by seeing Bill's
photos, the tour of Finn's 'incident site' was terrifying. The rest of
the weekend was much more pleasant. All the forums were informative,
from Tracy de-mystifying engine controller programming to Monty starting
a research program into quieting the rotary's exhaust. In my
not-so-humble opinion, this could be a pivotal factor in the widespread
acceptance of the rotary.

The highlight of the weekend for me was my ride in Tracy's rotary RV-4.
Acceleration & climb were obviously more impressive than my Lyc powered
-4, but the exciting thing for me was seeing a low altitude (~1500ft)
cruise power setting yielding 190-195 mph true airspeed burning between
8.5 & 9 gph. My goal for my RV-7 project is minimum 200 mph cruise at
max 10 gph. I've been a huge fan of the rotary since my dad's purchase
of a new '74 model RX-4, but I've had serious misgivings about whether
the rotary could achieve that fuel burn/speed combination due to numbers
quoted by others already flying. Tracy's plane proves those numbers are
achievable. Now, Mike Magee needs to get back to work on that aluminum
accessory cover that will bolt up to a standard Lyc mount. (Are you
listening, Mike?) Even though Mistral seems to be making their parts
available, I really can't afford the exchange rate & 'certified' prices.

The more I see of the Renesis, the more pleased I become that I'm
running so far behind everyone else. :-) By the time I'm ready for an
engine, it will be almost as cheap as a 2nd/3rd gen engine & *much*
easier to convert for aviation use. No water pump mods needed, dirt
simple & compact intake & exhaust manifolds, easier to tame exhaust
pulses, equal or superior horsepower, available used without being 'used
up', etc, etc.

Anyone who is installing or planning a rotary installation can't help
gaining invaluable knowledge while attending these events. Beyond that,
you just can't beat the great people you meet & form friendships with.

My heartfelt thanks to Tracy for sharing his wealth of knowledge & to
Laura for making these events possible. I can't wait to see you guys at
Bill & Linda's in February.

Charlie





--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster