X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c3) with ESMTP id 751142 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:08:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([209.215.60.51]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20051006000811.CWRN14447.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:08:11 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [209.215.60.51]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20051006000806.OHPO17850.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 20:08:06 -0400 Message-ID: <43446AC5.4030207@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:07:33 -0500 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: counterweights References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ed Anderson wrote: > Ok, just a thought. The 8.4 could have the same depth of the 9.1 > provided the area of the depression was a bit larger. Could pour > water into the depression until its full and then do the same for a > 9.1 {:>) and compare. Yes, I don't know of any markings on the > counterweights that could be used to sort it out. > > Well, I could believe 89-95 would have the same counterweights as > those rotors all supposedly weight the same 9.54 lbs regardless of the > compression (Humm a bit suspect there), but I would think the heavier > 10.4 lbs weights of the 86-88 would require heavier counterweights. > > Its a bitch when you don't get what you ordered and what's more have > little to go by to prove it one way or the other. > > Me? I'm Waiting for new right-gear leg. After replacing the clearly > bent left gear which had my left wing tip 3" lower than the right, I > found that after replacing that gear leg, that the left wing is now 6" > higher than the right one. Taking the right gear leg off and using a > straight edge, I found the lower axle area about 3" to the rear of > where it should be. Result of my hard landing back in Feb when I > found out that pulling the power all the way to idle made my 76x88 > prop act like a very effective airbrake. The excursion into the ditch > when the brakeline blew in June didn't help any I'm certain. > > But, hope to get it all back together for Shady Bend in October. > > > Ed A Hurry 'em up; you need to come & eat BBQ over here in MS the week prior (Oct. 22) to Shady Bend. Y'all come & have a little 'pre-rotor'. Charlie