X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [206.46.252.42] (HELO vms042pub.verizon.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c3) with ESMTP id 742274 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:45:00 -0400 Received: from verizon.net ([71.98.162.50]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0INL00FY3ZMX57K2@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:44:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:44:53 -0400 From: Finn Lassen Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Insurance In-reply-to: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <433CA6A5.6020609@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) Let's say you are taxiing on some busy airport and happen clip the wingtip of a Learjet with your prop. Wouldn't it be nice to have a $1,000,000 liability insurance, not to mention the insurance company's lawyers working for you? Finn Ernest Christley wrote: > > Rusty, why do you need insurance? Aren't you paying for your aircraft > up front? If you've not sunk a year's wages in borrowed money to > build the plane, what liability is there that you can't pay for. It > appears that hitting something expensive with a crashing airplane is a > very difficult thing to do. Nearly all the off airport accidents I've > heard of result in a bent up airplane and a very few bent trees. I > just don't understand understand the driving need to spend thousands a > year that could better be spent on gas or recurrent training. I still > think the biggest risk in general aviation is the nut holding the > stick. In the long run, $1500 of training or just keeping current > will pay me back much more than the equivalent insurance. >