Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.93.47.40; envelope-from=clouduster@austin.rr.com
Message-ID: <4338B3F9.6070907@austin.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:52:41 -0500
From: Dennis Haverlah <clouduster@austin.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Thermal Pellet
References: <list-733803@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-733803@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Leon Promet wrote:

>Hi Guys,
>
>Can someone please tell me why you want to remove the thermal pellet
>please??
>
>Leon
>
>Leon, 
>  
>

I don't have any experience with rotaries so I'm probably not the right 
one to answer but Tracy recommends disabling it and if it operates like 
a water thermostat pellet I'd want it removed if it is not necessary.  I 
have seen a V8 engine that warped the heads when the thermostat failed 
to open after it warmed up.  If the oil pellet failed to operate I'd 
think it could destroy the whole rotating assembly.  I'm open to 
rational reasons why it can be left in place.  Also Bruce T. has the 
pellet replacement rods.  He told me today the RX - 7 and Renesis use 
the same pellet replacement rods.  I was under the impression the RX -7 
pellet replacement was different and would not work in the Renesis.  
Anyone else have an opinion?

Dennis H.