X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.7) with ESMTP id 640050 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:49:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-065-188-083-049.carolina.res.rr.com [65.188.83.49]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j77Bn6Y5015809 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001601c59b46$0f5a0160$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NOMEX- Wear it!!! Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:49:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Forgot to mention that on my test flights I also wore a NOMEX flight suit and gloves as well as my old Air Force flight helmet. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 11:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: NOMEX- Wear it!!! > Russell Duffy wrote: > >> Greetings, >> He just got he airworthiness certificate today, . . . He managed to >> take off in about the first third of the runway, > > > I really don't want to sound abrasive or like an I-told-you-so smarta$$. > This is one of those times when email just doesn't cut it. But a good > friend was over today helping me weld axle plates onto my gear legs. (Gas > welding 1/2" steel plate to 1" round bar requires help!) We got on the > subject of flight testing, and this very subject came up. > > The FAA publishes a circular with very detailed advice on flight testing. > Their method includes lots of slow taxiing, with speed slowly building > over many runs, and then several hops before first flight. It was stated > that a lot of people ignore this advice and just sort of 'kick the tires, > and light the fires'. So I have a couple related questions. > > Did your friend do ground testing get before recieving the airworthiness, > or was it a kick-n-light procedure? > > What is the general consensus within this group about how much testing is > necessary? Do you lean more toward being fairly cavalier, or have you/do > you plan to follow the FAA guidelines and increment taxi speeds at 5mph > per several runs until the plane reaches flying speed and then do several > hops before an actual flight? Most important, how do you know when the > plane really is ready? Is there clear signs, or is it just a gut feeling? > > -- > This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against > instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make > mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their > decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >