In a message dated 6/24/2005 7:19:21 AM Pacific Standard Time,
eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
David, it was aluminum tubing which is what's called for
on the RV-6A brake system. However, in hindsight - thinking about
the low fatigue life of flexing aluminum, I think there are better
choices.
Ed
Ed,
As an ex-racer I must admit that I have been constantly appalled by
the state of GA aircraft braking systems! I have done programs on brake systems
at my EAA chapter advising against the solid tube brake setups. The only thing I
find worse is the nylon tubing included in some of the kits! I would not use
these systems on a kiddie go-kart. I have constantly been told by many of my
fellow builders that the pressure in aircraft brakes is "low". Or aircraft
brakes don't see as much action as car or motorcycle brakes. My response has
always been, "It only takes one failure to ruin your whole day." I am truly
sorry you had to be the poster boy for what I've been harping about.
You can use solid tube for almost the entire system. One needs only a
short flex line on both ends to ensure proper operation. Earls and aeroquip both
make a transition fitting so you can run the ss braided line for only a foot or
so on each end. Don't compromise here guys! Bill Randolf the guy who flew his
RV-8 around the world was stranded in Tahiland for 2 weeks due to an almost
identical brake failure. He had the same brake fire, and when the plane spun on
the runway he lost both tires. (standard gear) Be careful with the brakes.
Bill Jepson