X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.186] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTPS id 1012009 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:34:12 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.186; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-0-190.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.0.190]) by mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5NMXNAd013341 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:33:25 +1000 Message-ID: <00c701c57843$9872ced0$be00ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Forward from Mistral Engines SA Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:33:35 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C4_01C57897.699CDD90" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01C57897.699CDD90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill/ Ed, I thought they had two close primary and 2 out near the TB Secondaries? George ( down under)=20 Ok, thanks, Bill My person experience has also indicated injectors closer to the port = turn out to give me a smoother and better running engine. I have had = all 4 out as far as 21 inches and found throttle response and starts in = cold weather not to my liking. Ed A ----- Original Message -----=20 From: wrjjrs@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 4:41 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Forward from Mistral Engines SA =20 I find it interesting that after all of their experimenting with = injector positions - they chose to have all four very close to the = intake port. Ed A Ed, Francois claims this is the best position for efficiency and = power in their tests. That jibes with the comments that Mazda made for = the RX-8 injectors in or near the port. Bill Jepson ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01C57897.699CDD90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill/ Ed,
I thought they had two close = primary and 2 out=20 near the TB Secondaries?
George ( down under) 
Ok, thanks, Bill
 
My person experience has also indicated = injectors closer=20 to the port turn out to give me a smoother and better running = engine.  I=20 have had all 4 out as far as 21 inches and found throttle response and = starts=20 in cold weather not to my liking.
 
Ed A
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 wrjjrs@aol.com=20
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 = 4:41=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Forward from=20 Mistral Engines SA

 =20
I find it interesting that after all of = their=20 experimenting with injector positions - they chose to have all four = very=20 close to the intake port.
 
Ed A
 
Ed, Francois claims this is the best = position for=20 efficiency and power in their tests. That jibes with the comments = that Mazda=20 made for the RX-8 injectors in or near the port.
Bill=20 = Jepson 
------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01C57897.699CDD90--