Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.68.10.86; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <42B02ADA.2070207@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:19:22 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel pump mounting
References: <list-1002489@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1002489@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jim Sower wrote:

> WHOSE best practices? Everyone flying has what seems to work for him. 
> Which ones are you going to pick and which are you going to exclude 
> (and why)? And folks will pick this attribute from this best practice 
> and combine it with that attribute from that best practice ... and end 
> up with ... ?
> Is this actually going to work? ... Jim S.
>

Yes, Jim.  It will.

That is the beauty of the Wiki system.  People with knowledge and add to 
and extend it.  I wouldn't give it the time of day, if there was a Grand 
Poobah that had to annoint any additions with a holy EG/water 50/50 
ratio mix, I mean Evans RPG, or was that water wetter...

But its not like that.  The wiki lets you store what you know for me, 
and what I know for you.  If I post something stupid, you have the 
ability to post a correction behind me.  Megalomaniacs need not apply.  
It's a collaborative knowledge storage mechanism.  Let's get away from a 
'best practice' list and call it what it is.  A 'known solutions' list.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |