X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 981456 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:09:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm58aec.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.158]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050602010845.CSBI13767.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm58aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:08:45 -0400 Received: from mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.158]) by ibm58aec.bellsouth.net with SMTP id <20050602010845.JOEZ1856.ibm58aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:08:45 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.16.1 (webedge20-101-1106-101-20040924) X-Originating-IP: [65.11.42.181] From: To: Subject: [Fwd: COZY: Rotary risks] Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:08:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050602010845.JOEZ1856.ibm58aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> You guys are in trouble: > > From: al p wick > Date: 2005/06/01 Wed PM 05:53:06 EDT > To: Cozy_Builders@mailman.qth.net > Subject: COZY: Rotary risks > > I'm part way thru measuring Rotary risks. Using Tracy's newsletters as > basis(what a neat guy). One thing is abundantly clear, it is a very high > risk install. Substantially higher than the Lycoming. I know this is > going to upset a lot of people. I don't want to remain silent when I have > facts that may save a life. > Each change you make to a system increases your risk. Tons of changes. > Marginal cooling of oil and water 6+ years later. Having to watch > something is a root cause of pilot oversight. > High shut down risk of his EFI system(too bad, as his EFI could be a huge > risk reduction if designed differently). > Repeat root cause failures to design changes... the same pattern to all > the failures. > > Doesn't mean don't use rotary, Perry had much lower risk as he didn't > modify all those systems. It means, if you go that route, you better make > sure you use every skill you can muster to anticipate failures and > qualify each change while on the ground. > > I'll itemize the risk items in future, too many pans in fire right now. I > also have to look at other info sources. > > Risk is not measured by how many moving components you have. That is > propaganda. As are terms like "hand grenade" and "melting aluminum". It's > the total system that counts. > > Fire away! > > -al wick > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:13:16 -0700 "Keith N91KS" > writes: > The rotary guys are coming in much lighter and > > the reliability of those engines sounds like they have made great > > improvements. > > > > Keith > > Cozy N91KS > ______________________________________________________________ > Cozy_builders mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cozy_builders > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:Cozy_builders@mailman.qth.net >