|
Dave,
Sorry mate - I got you now !
I thought I'd better put that bit in about the second cooler for Jerry's
info, in case he might contemplate using two coolers to get around the
problem of small sump!
George ( down under)
> **** George, you have missed the point; I am not suggesting the use of
> 2 oil coolers. We were referring to the different capacities in car
> servicing. The reason that the 6 port takes an extra quart in the dry
> engine, is that there are two coolers to fill instead of just one. The
> oil pan has the same capacity in both 4 and 6 port engines. FWIW, Dave
> McC
> On 01/06/2005, at 12:46 PM, George Lendich wrote:
>
> > David,
> > Ken Waller has tried two coolers and the engine over cools with the two
> > working. Perhaps you could use one and bring the second on line - but
> > expensive and heavy for our applications.
> >
> > Better to have just the extra oil capacity.
> >
> > George ( down under)
> >
> >> **** Bobby, as I recall, the 6 port engine has 2 engine oil coolers as
> >> against one engine oil cooler fitted to the 4 port autol this would
> >> account for the difference in oil capacity. FWIW, Dave McC
> >>>>
> >>>> I would feel better with the 6 port oil volume.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bobby
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
> >
>
>
> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
|
|