X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 980651 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:27:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm57aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050601162619.BIAE13483.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm57aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:26:19 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm57aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050601162618.NAND25470.ibm57aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:26:18 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: p-port Renesis was Re: 213 mph 75% cruise (was: RX-8 6 port Intake - Like, complicated....) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:26:19 -0500 Message-ID: <012201c566c6$a4532f80$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0123_01C5669C.BB7D2780" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C5669C.BB7D2780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable my invitation still stands, come over to 69FD and you can see a single = rotor p-port run. I am now in the process of settling on a carburetor and its jetting. I am also working on the parts for the final configuration. =20 =20 Hi Richard, =20 =20 I will certainly take you up on that. Naturally, I don't doubt that it = will run, but I'll be interested to see how well it works in practice, wrt = fuel consumption, throttle response, etc. =20 =20 I can almost smell a runoff in the making (eventually), my REW based = engine vs your p-port. What do you say, same prop, max static prop rpm wins = :-) =20 Cheers, Rusty (gotta quit messing with the RV-3 first) ------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C5669C.BB7D2780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
my invitation still stands, come = over to 69FD=20 and you can see a single rotor p-port run. I am now in the process of = settling=20 on a carburetor and its jetting. I am also working on the parts for the = final=20 configuration.  
 
Hi Richard,  
 
I will certainly take you up on that.  = Naturally, I=20 don't doubt that it will run, but I'll be interested to see = how well=20 it works in practice, wrt fuel consumption, throttle response,=20 etc.   
 
I can almost smell a runoff in the making=20 (eventually), my REW based engine vs your p-port.  What do you = say,=20 same prop, max static prop rpm wins=20 :-)     
 
Cheers,
Rusty (gotta quit messing with the RV-3=20 first)
------=_NextPart_000_0123_01C5669C.BB7D2780--