X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 980311 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:09:24 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.137.216] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DdR5R-0007Yb-Vn for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:08:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=IEQe4rGeuEpNnOevRypWAN98aCru1YzYg6w1zX7LbGEychuZF1C9VxIx44l/eJDz; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:10:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] got pic of oilcooler/rad under motor mount Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79ed1e4780af61f9ff7f2b8b35710df66f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.137.216 Yes Ed, I did receive the picture and I thought the installation was very clean and well designed. Yesterday I worked till I dropped and only spent a few minutes e-mailing. As I have said the package of the oil cooler mounted beside the radiator tends to get too wide to be practical in my opinion. On exception would be turbos as they run the exhaust out the side. More later. Jerry On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 09:31 PM, Ed Klepeis wrote: > Dear Jerry > Did you recieve the pic of the rotary eng with the rad and oil > cooler mounted under the eng. > > Regards > Ed > Klepeis > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Hey" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 2:43 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis oil pan > > >> Thanks Bobby, it looks like the Renesis is running on nearly 1.5 >> qts. less oil than the 13B. Jerry >> >> >> On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 09:58 AM, Bobby J. Hughes wrote: >> >>> Jerry, >>> >>> On Bruce T's recommendations I am planning on using the older 13B >>> pickup >>> tube. He said it would need to be modified to fit with Fred's >>> mounting >>> plate. >>> >>> I have attached the oil info from the RX8 shop manual. It looks like >>> the >>> 6 port has more oil capacity. >>> >>> Bobby >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] >>> On >>> Behalf Of Jerry Hey >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:45 AM >>> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >>> Subject: [FlyRotary] Renesis oil pan >>> >>> Can anyone tell me if the Renesis pick up tube bolts up to the oil >>> pump >>> the same as the 13 B? I am trying to determine if I can use the >>> 13 B >>> pick up tube in a custom oil pan for a Renesis. If not, the Renesis >>> pick up tube will have to be modified. >>> FYI,The 13 B oil pan is two inches deeper than the Renesis pan and >>> holds >>> 158 oz. The Renesis oil pan holds 96 oz. >>> >>> At oil change how much oil does the Renesis take? The 13B takes >>> 5 >>> qts with filter. Thanks, Jerry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>> >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >