X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 945110 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:11:15 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm63aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050515221028.RCZU23609.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm63aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:10:28 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm63aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050515221026.LMVK253.ibm63aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:10:26 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: throttle body size (again) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:10:29 -0500 Message-ID: <000601c5599a$e7b176d0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C55970.FEDB6ED0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C55970.FEDB6ED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I have used a larger TB on one of my intakes. I found that sudden opening of the TB caused the engine to temporarily "bog" - it would = catch after a moment when the system caught up - but, I just did not like = that. I did not find any RPM increase using the larger TB, so I switched back to = the 65mm Mustang TB. =20 Ed=20 =20 Thanks, but do you remember what size the larger one was? =20 =20 Rusty (major intake scheming)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C55970.FEDB6ED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Yes, I have used a larger TB on = one of my=20 intakes.  I found that sudden opening of the TB caused the engine = to=20 temporarily "bog" - it would catch after a moment when the system caught = up -=20 but, I just did not like that.  I did not find any RPM increase = using the=20 larger TB, so I switched back to the 65mm Mustang TB.
 
Ed 
 
Thanks,=20 but do you remember what size the larger one=20 was?  
 
Rusty=20 (major intake scheming) 
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C55970.FEDB6ED0--