X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 945112 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:07:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-189-178.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.189.178]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j4FM6XLw028253 for ; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:06:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <004701c5599a$5b0afe90$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] throttle body size (again) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:06:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01C55978.D3C27010" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C55978.D3C27010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MessageYes, I have used a larger TB on one of my intakes. I found that = sudden opening of the TB caused the engine to temporarily "bog" - it = would catch after a moment when the system caught up - but, I just did = not like that. I did not find any RPM increase using the larger TB, so = I switched back to the 65mm Mustang TB. Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 5:52 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] throttle body size (again) Ed, were you the one that said you tried a larger TB at one time, and = didn't like it? I seem to recall that, but can't find the message. I = did find one that said you're using the 65mm TB now. Is the preferred mustang TB the 86-93 5.0L? Does it have a MAP port = on it? I'd still like to have overall measurements on it, if someone = has a 70mm laying around. =20 Thanks, Rusty (I'm goin in...to the single rotor) ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C55978.D3C27010 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Yes, I have used a larger TB on one of my = intakes.  I=20 found that sudden opening of the TB caused the engine to temporarily = "bog" - it=20 would catch after a moment when the system caught up - but, I just did = not like=20 that.  I did not find any RPM increase using the larger TB, so I = switched=20 back to the 65mm Mustang TB.
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 5:52 = PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] throttle = body size=20 (again)

Ed, were you = the one that=20 said you tried a larger TB at one time, and didn't like it?  I = seem to=20 recall that, but can't find the message.  I did find one that = said you're=20 using the 65mm TB now.
 
Is the = preferred mustang=20 TB the 86-93 5.0L?  Does it have a MAP port on it?  I'd = still like=20 to have overall measurements on it, if someone has a 70mm laying = around. =20
 
Thanks,
Rusty (I'm = goin in...to=20 the single rotor)
------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C55978.D3C27010--