X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail1.ubtanet.com ([65.174.123.181] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 944491 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 May 2005 23:30:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.174.123.181; envelope-from=archerw@ubtanet.com Received: from archer (unknown [208.5.86.221]) by mail1.ubtanet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1B41EC585 for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 21:30:05 -0600 (MDT) From: "Todd Archer" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: why a 4 port? Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 21:30:16 -0600 Message-ID: <003901c558fe$696f0c70$0400000a@archer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal Thanks, Charlie. Found this after a quick look: "The additional, or auxiliary ports open at about 6250 rpm. There is also an additional air intake duct for the high output engine. It will open at about 7250 rpm. Both engines now have three fuel injectors per rotor." So I guess that makes sense although I thought Tracy is looking at a target rpm of 7500 for his 4 port. Thanks, Todd Bruce T's explanation last fall at Tracy's (if I heard him correctly) was that in the car the addtl ports don't open until a higher rpm than anyone will run in an airplane (except Rusty when he installs one to avoid another turbo, of course). Charlie > > From: "Todd Archer" > Date: 2005/05/14 Sat PM 10:48:36 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Is Tracy a 4 or 6 port Renesis? > > Tracy's Renesis is definitely a 4 port. I confirmed that when I looked > over the "Renesis Project" segment of the website. > > What I have not found is a decent explanation of why Tracy went with the > 4 port over the 6. I know he didn't just shove in the first Ren he got > his hands on. I'm sorry if I missed it somewhere but could anyone > explain his thinking? > > Thanks, > Todd >