Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #21779
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: silly intake idea of the day
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:57:24 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Hi Rusty, seems to me the whole idea of building the runners and horns in a plenum is shooting for 'tuned induction' .With this idea you have just screwed any chance of achieving tuned length. Ram air in the inlet at 100kt {V climb} is good for less than 1/4 psi at best, the tuned length has much more benefit for volumetric efficiency than 1/4 psi. Put a filter on the plenum and as far from it as will fit under the cowl. FWIW, Dave McC { 6.5b in gestation} 
 
That's certainly a good point Dave.  Ernest's idea should work better than mine, but the box is going to probably be taller than I have room for.  Given the choice, I would rather have the power than a filter, since realistically speaking, there's no way I could ever wear this engine out with the amount of flying I (don't) do. 
 
I'm trying very hard to convince myself to just fly the plane, and leave it alone.  It's not like I need more power, since I'm at least in the 2500 fpm climb, and 200 mph range.  It's running well, and cooling too well.  When the UPS guy arrives tomorrow, I'll even have everything I need to actually put together a single rotor engine, so I should really leave well enough alone for now on the RV-3, and get to work on the single rotor projects. 
 
Wish me luck resisting a supercharger :-)
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster