X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 938713 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:13:09 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2005 11:27:03 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.92,172,1112587200"; d="scan'208"; a="48606832:sNHT27401384" Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j4AFBjnq026467 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 10 May 2005 11:12:10 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 10 May 2005 11:12:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4280CF4A.7090104@nc.rr.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:12:10 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2005 15:12:10.0934 (UTC) FILETIME=[A39A0560:01C55572] cardmarc@charter.net wrote: >Look at the latest engineering of these engines. Audi does it for one of many. The valves are electronically controlled. Since you cruise at a small % of power, you shut off the power you don't need for accelleration, etc. The cylinders come on as needed automatically. Of course you also could just throw the engine out and get a smaller engine for that part of the trip, which is exactly what lots of hybrids are coming to. 2 engines, one for to and one for cruise! >Marc > > >>From: "Jack Ford" >>Date: 2005/05/09 Mon PM 10:49:42 EDT >>To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >>Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF >> >>That entire variable cylinder configuration routine seems to me to be a lot >>of (old) advertising hype. The concept seems to be that the public thinks >>fewer cylinders burn less fuel, so you can have your eight cylinder cake and >>eat four cylinder fuel. Purest balderdash. >> >> >> Didn't Cadillac market a 12 cylinder at on point that would disconnect the crankshaft to half of the engine for cruise? Controlling power with throttle means less air in the cylinder, leading to less compression pressure. Doesn't higher pressure equate to more complete combustion? Would running 2 cylinders hard be more efficient than running 4 cylinders half as hard? -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |