X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 935847 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 07 May 2005 13:39:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-189-178.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.189.178]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j47Hd7Lw000907 for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 13:39:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000d01c5532b$b2517870$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Flew Again Re: Home again, home again! Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 13:39:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5530A.2B06A000" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5530A.2B06A000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, No Renesis at this point, just relating to Tracy's comments more about a = tight new engine producing more power, more heat. My engine is a 91 = turbo block 13B. Yes, I think new rotors (with new apex slots), new = type apex seals and new rotor housings - plus setting up the side seals = to the minimum specs, new metal oil rings - I think just added up to a = much tighter engine than I had previously. Flew this morning and could tell the difference in power. Advance the = throttle and a strong push is felt in the rear end - much different. = ROC seems to be up considerably as well. Will release numbers after a = couple more flights. Recall I fly with a "Plugs Up" orientation, my engine is rotated 90 deg = so that the plugs are on top and exhaust/intake on the bottom. For that = reason I do not use a "bed" type mount - so no aluminum plate between = oil pan and block - just some gray silicon gasket sealant. Ed A ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Carter=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 9:41 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Home again, home again! Ed, good morning. I noticed your statement, "This is pretty much what Tracy reported = when first flying with the Renesis engine - tight engine, more power, = more heat. So it appears that this engine is much tighter. I can now = maintain level flight burning 4 gph when it used to take 5.5 gph. Can't = wait until its broken in a bit more to see what the top end is. = Overhaul kit from Real World Solutions and parts from Bruce T appear to = have come together in a tight nit engine." Are you flying with an RX-8 Renesis engine now? or just relating your = experience with a tightly overhauled RX-7, comparing to Tracy's RX-8? And, I liked the picture of your engine mount (photo you sent of the = "engine hoist" at the "emergency landing" airport when your apex seal = peeled back). It doesn't look like you use the aluminum plate between = oil pan and housings. Have any details you could send about your = "attachment point adapters"? David ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed Anderson=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 12:41 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Home again, home again! Wife, drove me and my flight gear to aircraft getting there around = 1100. By time finished loading, reinstalling the avionics - the @$#%^ = transponder wouldn't slide all the way back in an engage the pins it was = 1130 and the wind was picking up. - I figured I'd stay low enough and = out of class B airspace anyway. =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5530A.2B06A000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi David,
 
No Renesis at this point, just relating = to Tracy's=20 comments more about a tight new engine producing more power, more = heat.  My=20 engine is a 91 turbo block 13B.  Yes, I think new rotors (with new = apex=20 slots), new type apex seals and new rotor housings - plus setting up the = side=20 seals to the minimum specs, new metal oil rings - I think just added up = to a=20 much tighter engine than I had previously.
 
Flew this morning and could tell the = difference in=20 power.  Advance the throttle and a strong push is felt in the rear = end=20 - much different.  ROC seems to be up considerably as = well.  Will=20 release numbers after a couple more flights.
 
Recall I fly with a "Plugs Up" = orientation, my=20 engine is rotated 90 deg so that the plugs are on top and exhaust/intake = on the=20 bottom.  For that reason I do not use a "bed" type mount - so no = aluminum=20 plate between oil pan and block - just some gray silicon gasket=20 sealant.
 
Ed A
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 David=20 Carter
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 = 9:41=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Home = again, home=20 again!

Ed, good morning.
I noticed your statement, "This is = pretty much=20 what Tracy reported when first flying with the Renesis engine - tight = engine,=20 more power, more heat.  So it appears that this engine is much=20 tighter.  I can now maintain level flight burning 4 gph when it = used to=20 take 5.5 gph.  Can't wait until its broken in a bit more to see = what the=20 top end is.  Overhaul kit from Real World Solutions and parts = from Bruce=20 T appear to have come together in a tight nit engine."
 
Are you flying with an RX-8 Renesis = engine=20 now?  or just relating your experience with a tightly overhauled = RX-7,=20 comparing to Tracy's RX-8?
 
And, I liked the picture of your = engine mount=20 (photo you sent of the "engine hoist" at the "emergency landing" = airport when=20 your apex seal peeled back).  It doesn't look like you use the = aluminum=20 plate between oil pan and housings.  Have any details you could = send=20 about your "attachment point adapters"?
 
David
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ed=20 Anderson
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 12:41 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Home again, home again!

Wife, drove me and my flight gear to = aircraft=20 getting there around 1100.  By time finished loading, = reinstalling the=20 avionics - the @$#%^ transponder wouldn't slide all the way back in an = engage=20 the pins it was 1130 and the wind was picking up.  - I = figured I'd=20 stay low enough and out of class B airspace anyway.  =
<snip>
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C5530A.2B06A000--