Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #21278
From: Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Build Options
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 12:22:53 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
I can't imagine not opting for the dynamic balance.  You get "free" ponies from the smoothness of a well-balanced assembly, as well as improved longevity.

Dale R.


From: davidclifford01@comcast.net
Date: 2005/05/02 Mon AM 09:41:52 EDT
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Renesis Build Options

Before I send a 50% deposit to East Coast Rotary to have Bruce build my engine,  he offers two options during the build,  ceramic coating the rotors @$310 and dynamic spin balancing the engine rotating assembly to within +- 1g true @$350.  Any thoughts, concerns, or comments on these options would be appreciated as I am sending payment this week.  Thanks everyone.  Dave


> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html



From: Mark R Steitle <mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu>
Subject: [FlyRotary] FW: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 13:32:04 +0000
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings

 

Paul,

Here’s a picture of my 20B Cosmo exhaust inserts.  They are different from the N/A splitters in that there is a “shelf” across the top with a passage feeding into the EGR system.  You can see  how much of the port is restricted by the shelf.  So, my impression is that these inserts are designed to reduce emissions, although they may also reduce db’s too.  The turbo inserts don’t have the shelf, or the splitter.  They were a bear to remove.

 

Mark

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of sqpilot@bellsouth.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 1:20 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings

 

OK...makes sense to me now.  I didn't realize the Cosmo splitters were different than the NA.  Thanks for the explanation.  Paul Conner, flying tomorrow (temps should be around 80 degrees and sunny in Mobile, AL).  Maybe I'll look across the bay and see Rusty in the air. 

----- Original Message -----

From: Bulent Aliev

Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 9:00 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings

 

Hope we are talking about the same thing. My Cosmo (and 20B) housings had exchaust port inserts that diverted the gasses on  angle to the turbo. The inserts I installed were straight out.
Buly

On 5/1/05 1:39 PM, "sqpilot@bellsouth.net" <sqpilot@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Hi, Buly.....perhaps I don't understand. If you removed the splitters from the Cosmo housings and replaced them with NA inserts, don't you still have splitters? I thought that the NA inserts had splitters, and the turbo did not?  Paul Conner

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster