X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 921005 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:20:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.65; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from paul ([209.214.44.7]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with SMTP id <20050501021946.FFOV2434.imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net@paul> for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:19:46 -0400 Message-ID: <00d401c54e7a$649b6790$2c2cd6d1@paul> From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 13:20:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C54E50.7AC63F10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C54E50.7AC63F10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housingsOK...makes sense to me now. = I didn't realize the Cosmo splitters were different than the NA. Thanks = for the explanation. Paul Conner, flying tomorrow (temps should be = around 80 degrees and sunny in Mobile, AL). Maybe I'll look across the = bay and see Rusty in the air. =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bulent Aliev=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 9:00 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings Hope we are talking about the same thing. My Cosmo (and 20B) housings = had exchaust port inserts that diverted the gasses on angle to the = turbo. The inserts I installed were straight out. Buly On 5/1/05 1:39 PM, "sqpilot@bellsouth.net" = wrote: Hi, Buly.....perhaps I don't understand. If you removed the = splitters from the Cosmo housings and replaced them with NA inserts, = don't you still have splitters? I thought that the NA inserts had = splitters, and the turbo did not? Paul Conner ------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C54E50.7AC63F10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's new rotor housings
OK...makes sense to me now.  I = didn't realize=20 the Cosmo splitters were different than the NA.  Thanks for the=20 explanation.  Paul Conner, flying tomorrow (temps should be around = 80=20 degrees and sunny in Mobile, AL).  Maybe I'll look across the bay = and see=20 Rusty in the air. 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Bulent=20 Aliev
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 = 9:00=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ed's = new rotor=20 housings

Hope we are talking about the same thing. My = Cosmo=20 (and 20B) housings had exchaust port inserts that diverted the gasses = on=20  angle to the turbo. The inserts I installed were straight=20 out.
Buly

On 5/1/05 1:39 PM, "sqpilot@bellsouth.net" = <sqpilot@bellsouth.net>=20 wrote:
Hi,=20 Buly.....perhaps I don't understand. If you removed the splitters = from the=20 Cosmo housings and replaced them with NA inserts, don't you still = have=20 splitters? I thought that the NA inserts had splitters, and the = turbo did=20 not?  Paul Conner

------=_NextPart_000_00D1_01C54E50.7AC63F10--