Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com
Message-ID: <000701c54da5$b960d240$2402a8c0@edward2>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-920365@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: temp senders
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:57:42 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Wendell, actually the current throttle body is 65mm - if I wrote 75mm, its 
was an error
However, I have tried a 75mm TB - its BIG.  But, I did not like the way the 
engine would bog if the throttle was suddenly opened - apparently the big 
opening suddenly opened drops the manifold pressure quicker than the system 
can accommodate.  In any case, I went back to the 65mm and like it better.

Ed


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wendell Voto" <jwvoto@itlnet.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 11:03 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: temp senders


> Since engine actually started, next step is to get all the temp sensors
> hooked up and get intake manifold finalized.
>
> Is the ATM2265 the correct adapter for the oil pressure sender port? Need 
> to
> put a tee or a cross fitting on oil line to get pressure gauge, reduction
> gear oil and temp.
>
> I noticed that Ed is using a 75 mm throttle body.  Is this the best size? 
> If
> so will be watching for one.
>
> Wendell
>
>
>>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>