Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #19895
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: rule of thumb and RV-3 sizes- was Cooling Inlet
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:36:49 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: rule of thumb and RV-3 sizes- was Cooling Inlet

>On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:06:29 -0400 Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com> wrote.
>MessageThis does "sound right"  but the few studies I've seen showing the

>exit air temp on air cooled engines was very close to what water cooled

>engines have been.


From: echristley

This is completely logical if you consider the extremely small surface area
available to transfer heat on the cylinderhead fins compared to the surface
area on even a small radiator.


I agree.  To take this even further, an *optimized* water cooled installation will use fewer CFM to cool a given number of BTUs (and have less drag) than an aircooled engine.  The P-51 would probably not been able to escort bombers all the way to Germany and back if it had an air cooled engine (all other factors remaining the same).
 
Tracy
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster