Return-Path: <jesse@jessfarr.com>
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3)
  with ESMTP id 852057 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:42:16 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.35; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com
Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2005040121412701300dokkre>; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 21:41:27 +0000
Message-ID: <00ee01c53703$8530e1d0$057ba8c0@farr.com>
From: "jesse farr" <jesse@jessfarr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-851930@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Davies-Craig EWP Test Results
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:41:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180

What ? Are you crazy ?  And avoid all this useless stomping about in the 
woods stuff.  Get serious, that would probably make way too much sense. <g>
jofarr, soddy tn

----- Original Message ----- From: "randy echtinaw" <rjechtinaw@ia4u.net>>

>  I will try to phrase this question so as not to reveal my stupidity but - 
> if you are going to test EWP's and EDWP's for pressure, volume and amp 
> draw comparisons why not set them up with an engine block and a couple of 
> radiators and get some real factual data from  these comparisons.