Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net
Message-ID: <00fb01c53661$2b8f0cd0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0>
From: "rijakits" <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-850921@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: DO NOT ARCHIVE - topANDbottom
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:19:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all,

this might be a good chance to settle the top/bottom issue once for all.
Marv, as you are the guy who is gracious enough to spend your time running
this great list, why don't you give it a shot and
decide on this one! My personal preference aside, it would make it a lot
easier to get going with ONE decision, either ONE.
I believe people on list are mature enough to accept a decision from you, no
matter their personal preference....

Thomas J. (this ONE time: topANDbottom:)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: DO NOT ARCHIVE


> Hi Bob,
>
> Many people include the "do not archive" tidbit to keep their messages
from
> showing up online.  I don't want to set a precedent that says anytime
anyone
> uses that phrase I'm going to have to stop whatever I'm doing and go clean
up
> the archive... that's just not going to happen.  (This was covered just a
> short time ago, remember?)  On this current deal the messages will be
> scattered across an easily identifiable period of time, and all I need to
do
> is check the subjects and message sizes and flag the offenders for
deletion...
> I'll get most of the batch in one fell swoop, then I don't have to think
about
> it anymore.  I don't really mind too much when these things come up, as
> there's such a wealth of knowledgable people here, the suggestions often
reach
> beyond the current issue and we all get to learn something new.  All I
know
> for sure is you can't run one of these lists expecting every post to
maintain
> some precise level of perfection or expect the subjects to be topical 100%
of
> the time.  I've been running online forums since the early 80's and if I
had a
> nickel for every time someone stepped outside the lines I'd have me a
sizable
> pile of nickels.  Thanks for the suggestion, though, your consideration is
> appreciated.
>
>   <marv>
>
>
>
> "Bob Perkinson" <bobperk@bellsouth.net>:
>
>   Marv,
>   Some times chatter is good, but it does take up space and has nothing to
do
>   with the subject material.  Would it be of any help to you if those of
us
>   that just want to make an off handed remark, preface the subject line
with
>   DO NOT ARCHIVE.  That might make it easer to remove the non pertinent
post.
>   Just an idea FWIW
>
>
>   Bob Perkinson
>   Hendersonville, TN.
>   RV9A N658RP Reserved
>   If nothing changes
>   Nothing changes
>


Hi all,

this might be a good chance to settle the top/bottom issue once for all.
Marv, as you are the guy who is gracious enough to spend your time running
this great list, why don't you give it a shot and
decide on this one! My personal preference aside, it would make it a lot
easier to get going with ONE decision, either ONE.
I believe people on list are mature enough to accept a decision from you, no
matter their personal preference....

Thomas J. (this ONE time: topANDbottom:)