Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.169; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net
Message-ID: <00da01c5365f$feaab300$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0>
From: "rijakits" <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-850703@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Davies-Craig EWP Test Results
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:10:36 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Hey" <jerryhey@earthlink.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 6:08 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Davies-Craig EWP Test Results


> Bob,  thanks for the test.  I wish you could convert everything to 1.25
>   hose.  The reduced sections must have a significant  negative effect.
> I am not a pump expert but I think the EWPs are intended to move a
> large volume at low pressure and probably do not do well with
> restrictions.  If  you wanted to change out the fittings on your rad to
> 1.25s, I am sure Ed Klepeis could do the job.
>
>    I am converting my rad from AN16 to 1.25 hose which will be the only
> size in the system.  This is easy for me as I have a C& R rad in which
> the inlets and outlets of choice can be simple screwed in place.
> After reading the mixed results from your test,  I goggled Davis, Craig
> and spent an hour reading one good report after another.
>
> Thanks for the effort.  We all appreciate it.  Jerry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   I note that Paul L. again today pointed out that only a certified fool
> would use an EWP.
>
...cut

Well, PL pointed out that it takes more than any of the available/discussed
EWP's to duplicate the original EDWP's flow.
According to Bob's tests and other data available ( B. Schertz's doc.), he
is right on that.

What seems never have crossed his mind though is the possibility, that the
EDWP was built to cope with idle-speed/heat/AC-on/stop and go traffic - as
recently discussed on here.
Todd seems to get away with EWP just fine, so maybe the flow doesn't have to
be so high.
I don 't dare to challange PL on the possibility that the EDWP is probably
way over sized and needs lots of power for that excess flow ( ..not now at
least, as long as he is too "irritated" about EWP's :)

What I would like to know how the recently discussed low flow/high delta T
affects the engine - higher local temps at the spark plug areas and therefor
higher delta T to the intake area. Warpage, etc.
Probably no way to tell yet, but wait for some EWP equipped bird do some
serious time with that layout.

Intuitively I am not a EWP fan (I prefer the high flow/low delta T
approach - more temp tolerance in my specific hot surroundings), but like
some others on the list I will wait for serious results - can't beat the
proof in the P.!


Cheers,
Thomas J.