Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 818559 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:16:04 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.52.245.18; envelope-from=wschertz@ispwest.com Received: from 7n7z201 (unverified [67.136.145.204]) by ispwestemail2.mdeinc.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.0.340.3) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:15:17 -0800 Message-ID: <010801c53073$8270ccd0$db918843@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust System Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:15:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 The beam mount uses the oil pan bolts, but is not integral to the oil pan. Putting it on the other end, you have to worry about the oil pump chain drive -- my oil pan is modified to give a greater flat area under the beam, couldn't do it on the water pump end (I think) Right now it doesn't look like May is feasible, but still working on it. Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser # 4045 > I've got a 13b & a 12a down in the hangar, but it seems that every new > data point on the Renesis is telling me I've got to have one. > > Is your beam mount independent of the oil pan? I'd like to do something > similar, but on the firewall end of the engine & use a top support in > tension like the Powersport setup. (Trying to find a way around the mount > tube conflicts.) > > Think you can make it down here in May? > > Charlie > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html