Return-Path: Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 812007 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:54:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.164; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.71]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDBB364191 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164]) by filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30254-26-17 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-85-150.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.85.150]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1F4364161 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <423CF3B9.3030707@frontiernet.net> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:53:29 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Alternators References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0511-1, 03/17/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Boy, am I glad to hear THAT!! Here I was beginning to think that all the reliable service I've gotten over the years was a monumental fluke and it would all come back to bite me SOON. Now I can stick with my $30 70A N-D and have it rebuilt for another $30 if it quits ... Jim S. Charlie England wrote: > Marv, I hope this doesn't step on too many toes, but here goes: > > Well, he did identify himself as having a financial stake in his > statements. > > Some of that stuff is probably true for *some* a/c alternators. Some > of it is not universally true; some may not be true, period. Some alts > have canted brushes, some have perpendicular brushes. Fan orientation > will affect airflow to some degree, but thousands of auto alts. are > being run successfully in a/c with no fan at all, using blast tubes. > The ones with fans still attached still move air when spun the other > way. Some car engines spin the alt in the same direction as a/c > engines. Some a/c alts might have locking tabs, but not all. According > to auto docs, some auto alts are wound delta & some are wound Y. He > mentions that alts are birotational then later says that a/c alts are > wound backward for backward rotation. He says that the rotor shaft is > shorter but the cases are identical. While he's probably correct about > special insulations, coatings, etc for turbo'd & turbine hardware > designed for extreme altitudes, I strongly doubt that much if any of > that applies for stuff found on NA piston singles. It doesn't seem to > apply for some electric gear retract pumps, which are straight out of > marine outdrive tilt mechanisms. I've witnessed certified a/c > alternators work just fine after being rebuilt in greasy floored auto > electric shops with auto components. Not on my airplane of course... > If anyone needs something overhauled, bring it with you to the rotary > spring fling thing & we'll run it 9 miles down the road to the > uncertified repair station. > > If there's interest, I'll post the article on the aeroelectric list & > let Bob Nuckolls critique it. > > Charlie > (feeling irritable after a day of figuring out how much it has cost me > this past year to have my money spent where & in ways I don't want it > spent) > > Kelly Troyer wrote: > >> I do not know about everyone elses engines but my 13B turns the same >> direction as A/C engines built in the US !! I do not know enough to >> comment about the other differences noted....... >> -- >> Kelly Troyer >> Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 >> >> >> >> >> -------------- Original message from "Marvin Kaye" >> : -------------- >> >> >> > I thought you'd find this interesting. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Posted by "Hamid A. Wasti" to the Lancair Mail List: >> > >> > I saw this posted on another list. I am passing it along for >> general >> > interest, with no warranty for the accuracy of the information >> contained in >> > it. >> > >> > >> > From Pifer's Airmotive, Inc. Pontiac MI >> > >> > DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AIRCRAFT & AUTO ALTERNATORS USING A FORD >> BELT DRIVEN 12v >> > OR 24v ALTERNATOR FOR A COMPARISON >> > >> > 1. Although alternators are bi-rotational, aircraft engines turn >> opposite of >> > automotive. This means cooling fans must be canted in the >> opposite direction. >> > Also, pulley and belt size vary due to coming-in speed. >> > >> > 2. The thru bolts are of a higher tensile strength utilizing an >> > anti-rotation >> > device in the form of a lock tab. The rectifier assembly has a >> heavy duty >> > diode with higher voltage and amp. capacity. Also, one excites >> at 90 PIV (Peak >> > Inverse Voltage) and the other at 150 PIV. Radio suppression is >> designed for >> > 108 frequencies and up which is the VHF and 108 and down which >> is FM band. >> > >> > 3. The brushes have a higher graphite content and they utilize a >> tin plate >> > on >> > the brush leads to prevent corrosion. >> > >> > 4. The stator is of the Delta wind rather than the “Y" wind and >> it does not >> > utilize the stator terminal. The aircraft unit also carries “H" >> insulation >> > which is capable of 200 degrees centigrade temperatures. It also >> is rated at >> > 60 amp. instead of 55. >> > > > >> > 5. The rotor has a shorter shaft and a smaller thread size. >> Because of the >> > opposite rotation it is wound in the opposite direction. It also >> uses "H” >> > insulation and Havel varnish. >> > >> > 6. The front and rear housings are the same as automotive. >> > >> > With this brief description, I hope I have enlightened you on the >> > differences >> > between aircraft and automotive alternators. Using automotive >> units in an >> > aircraft creates a potential safety hazard as well as a short >> alternator life >> > and unreliability. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > >