Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.164; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Message-ID: <423CEFEB.7080602@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:37:15 -0600
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Water Pump Viscosity Test
References: <list-811451@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-811451@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Do the ?? - Davies (?) folks have a web site?  If so, what might the URL be?

Bob White wrote:

>Hi Jerry,
>
>20 GPM was my design goal which was set based on Bill Schertz' analysis.
>At that flow rate, it gives me room to accomodate some problems with
>heat transfer and air flow.  I think Bill's analysis give a pretty
>clear picture of what's needed.  If I go thru it and adjust for my
>system, I get:  (All of the following is based on Bill's charts and
>analysis.)
>
>1.  Set the redline temp at 210.  That is Bruce's never exceed temp.
>2.  For a 200 HP engine with a 50 F drop across the engine, I will need
>     a flow of 15 GPM and 160 F water out of the radiators.
>3.  On a real hot day (110F), I will have a 50F potential between the 
>     outside air, and the air out of the radiators.
>
>  
>
>  
>