Return-Path: Received: from smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with SMTP id 811702 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:18:40 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.163.170.2; envelope-from=dcarter@datarecall.net Received: from unknown (HELO Davidscmptr) (dcarter11@sbcglobal.net@64.219.115.122 with login) by smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2005 20:17:50 -0000 Message-ID: <062a01c52cc0$b8bd8be0$6401a8c0@Davidscmptr> Reply-To: "David Carter" From: "David Carter" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FD coolant level sensor? Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:17:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Gotcha - you thought I actually had a system! It's all in my head (and a huge bunch of e-mails I've saved in various folders)! I should have said, "It is what I 'want' or 'plan' to implement. I do have my two junk yard evap cores - looking for someone to weld on 1" dia tubing or fittings. On a 13B (RX-7 or RX-8 - I'm planning to buy an RX-8 engine) in my tail dragger RV-6 with engine mounted so transmission end of engine is fwd with Tracy's 2.85 PSRU, I'll want a hole in the "back housing" (up front in airplane) at top of water jacket. I have no idea if there is any hole there in the production engine. Tracy? - I believe the coolant pressure should be higher at that point than at the outlet of radiators/inlet to water pump - inlet to pump should be lowest pressure in system (and this should be the pressure int the expansion/header tank which is plumbed directly to that point), so I expect some coninuous flow of coolant through the "high point bleed line into the tank and then down into main hose going to inlet of pump. Since this flow will be bypassing the radiators, there needs to be a restrictor in the line, just line there is a restrictor in a "mechanical oil pressure gage's line from the engine to the gage" - to prevent much flow if line cracks. In this coolant case, the worry is not cracking, just the fact we know there is some coolant bypassing the radiator - so flow must be low, just good enough to pass air during filling - and steam during high power/too hot? David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:36 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FD coolant level sensor? > David, > > Where and how did you install the air bleed at the high point of the cooling > system? > > Bryan > > > > There are two kinds of cooling systems (kinds of "expansion tanks") as far > > as I know: 1) the one most people think of and talk about is a > > non-pressurized expansion tank that gets fluid when pressure "burps" past > > the radiator cap. That is the kind where the fluid gets sucked back into > > radiator AFTER engine shutdown (IF there are no leaks anywhere to let AIR > > suck in - which would prevent sucking fluid from the expansion tank). > > 2) the 1998 or so Ford Contour system (and others) where "expansion > > tank"/"header tank" is pressurized (the pressure cap is on the tank, not > the > > radiator), and it has a tube going down out of the bottom of tank to a T > > fitting at bottom radiator hose; also there is a tiny "air bleed line" in > > the highest part of the engine (somewhere in the head at the top of the > > water passages) that slopes UP into the bottom of the "pressurized > expansion > > tank/header tank" - any air at top of engine would flow up into the tank > and > > would be replaced in the head by gravity flow of coolant into the system - > > coolant level in the expansion tank is slightly above the highest point in > > the head's coolant passages. > > > > This "Contour" system would be perfectly safe to have the "coolant level > > switch" in the tank. There would be none of the dangers cited for systems > > that have the NON-pressurized exp tank. > > - Also, none of the "burping" several times after filling as there is > > with the "non-pressurized" tanks - in Contour system, you fill thru the > > "expansion tank" - fluid runs out bottom and fills entire radiator-engine > > block system from the bottom up, with (theoretically) NO air trapped in > any > > radiator or engine part as the fluid rises to top of head and then up into > > bottom of tank. When fluid in the tank starts to rise, you know th engine > > and radiator system is full. Of course, there could be "pockets" > somewhere > > or a hose that runs up and back down slightly where air could be trapped - > > so an engine run should move the air to top of system, where it would > bleed > > into the bottom of pressurized expansion tank, and "burping" would be > done. > > - This is what I'm designing for my RV-6/13B aircraft. > > > > David Carter > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >