Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 811687 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:35:10 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.35; envelope-from=bhcishere@comcast.net Received: from theboss (c-66-229-206-27.we.client2.attbi.com[66.229.206.27]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005031919342401300egbeie>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:34:24 +0000 Message-ID: <07ed01c52cba$e3e4f7a0$1bcee542@madhouse.home> From: "Bryan" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FD coolant level sensor? Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:36:04 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 David, Where and how did you install the air bleed at the high point of the cooling system? Bryan > There are two kinds of cooling systems (kinds of "expansion tanks") as far > as I know: 1) the one most people think of and talk about is a > non-pressurized expansion tank that gets fluid when pressure "burps" past > the radiator cap. That is the kind where the fluid gets sucked back into > radiator AFTER engine shutdown (IF there are no leaks anywhere to let AIR > suck in - which would prevent sucking fluid from the expansion tank). > 2) the 1998 or so Ford Contour system (and others) where "expansion > tank"/"header tank" is pressurized (the pressure cap is on the tank, not the > radiator), and it has a tube going down out of the bottom of tank to a T > fitting at bottom radiator hose; also there is a tiny "air bleed line" in > the highest part of the engine (somewhere in the head at the top of the > water passages) that slopes UP into the bottom of the "pressurized expansion > tank/header tank" - any air at top of engine would flow up into the tank and > would be replaced in the head by gravity flow of coolant into the system - > coolant level in the expansion tank is slightly above the highest point in > the head's coolant passages. > > This "Contour" system would be perfectly safe to have the "coolant level > switch" in the tank. There would be none of the dangers cited for systems > that have the NON-pressurized exp tank. > - Also, none of the "burping" several times after filling as there is > with the "non-pressurized" tanks - in Contour system, you fill thru the > "expansion tank" - fluid runs out bottom and fills entire radiator-engine > block system from the bottom up, with (theoretically) NO air trapped in any > radiator or engine part as the fluid rises to top of head and then up into > bottom of tank. When fluid in the tank starts to rise, you know th engine > and radiator system is full. Of course, there could be "pockets" somewhere > or a hose that runs up and back down slightly where air could be trapped - > so an engine run should move the air to top of system, where it would bleed > into the bottom of pressurized expansion tank, and "burping" would be done. > - This is what I'm designing for my RV-6/13B aircraft. > > David Carter >