Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 811406 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.38; envelope-from=ALVentures@cox.net Received: from BigAl ([68.7.14.39]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050319162553.ORTL9923.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:25:53 -0500 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Builder Risk Insurance Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:25:56 -0800 Message-ID: <002201c52ca0$5402b420$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01C52C5D.45E1BE10" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C52C5D.45E1BE10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Builder Risk Insurance =20 They would not renew my policy in December when I told them I was = putting a rotary engine in it. I tried to work through the logic of why the = engine mattered on a builders risk policy. The best answer they gave (which I thought was BS) was if you finished building and started flying without notifing the insurance company, in some states the ins company might = have to cover any flight losses. =20 Ron Milligan =20 That's interesting; and a bit unnerving. I've had an Avemco policy for a = few years now, and I don't recall ever being asked what engine is going in. = And I think it says somewhere on the policy that is for "Not in motion" coverage. =20 I guess I'll have to keep the engine a secret. =20 Al ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C52C5D.45E1BE10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Builder Risk Insurance

They would not renew my policy in December when I told them I was putting a = rotary engine in it. I tried to work through the logic of why the engine mattered on a builders risk policy. The best answer they gave = (which I thought was BS) was if you finished building and started flying without notifing the insurance company, in some states the ins company might = have to cover any flight losses.

Ron Milligan

That’s interesting; and a bit unnerving. I’ve had an Avemco policy for a = few years now, and I don’t recall ever being asked what engine is = going in. And I think it says somewhere on the policy that is for = “Not in motion” coverage.

<= /font>

I guess = I’ll have to keep the engine a secret.

<= /font>

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C52C5D.45E1BE10--