Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 791169 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:35:36 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.160.248] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DASIv-0007jK-Cl for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:34:46 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=Rdudh8Nx7tsfEwqVGGoncZhZAFlfsIAeUbyND/GzPMP7seRlNyfWVsbqFOsjh4uv; Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:35:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] peripheral ports Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--733827411 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <739E2364-93BC-11D9-9FC6-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79fa9534335d2fc764d703bc9128d212eb350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.160.248 --Apple-Mail-2--733827411 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Paul, first I want to say that I am not the expert. I have not yet=20 completed building my own p port. The major difference between our p=20 ports and those found in race cars is that our engines are limited to=20= 7500 rpm (or in my case to 6000 rpm). These are very low rpm numbers=20 for a p port. Never-the -less considerable power can be developed. =20 Probably up to 250 hp @ 7500 rpm. I am hoping for 220 hp at 6000 rpm=20 which is more power than my Tailwind will ever need. It is my =20 understanding after talking to a lot of people that at our rpms you can=20= leave the exhaust port stock with the splitters installed. Like Buly=20 said, close off all the stock intake passages with epoxy. Jerry On Saturday, March 12, 2005, at 09:57 PM, Paul wrote: > Hi, all....I need to make an inquiry regarding peripheral ports.=A0 I=20= > understand that the housings get the round peripheral ports installed,=20= > and that the exhaust port is also modified to complete the P-Port=20 > modification to the rotor housings. > =A0=A0=A0=A0 What, if anything needs to be done to the existing center = and end=20 > plates?=A0 If I purchase a set of p-ported housings, can I use the=20 > e-shaft and rotors from either my 1989 4-port turbo engine with it's=20= > 9.0 compression rotors, or the e-shaft and rotors from my 1988 NA=20 > 6-port engine with it's 9.4 compression rotors?=A0 Or would I be = better=20 > off using the street-ported 4-port center and end plates? I asked Paul=20= > Lamar, but I didn't understand his short answer.=A0 He mentioned = epoxy,=20 > but is that for the p-port housings or do you block off the ports in=20= > the front, rear and center plates that have the triangular ports in=20 > them?=A0 Thanks in advance for all replies.=A0 Unfortunately, I am not=20= > familiar with the internals of this engine, and how the stock porting=20= > works (or doesen't work) with peripheral ports.=A0=A0 Paul Conner > =A0 --Apple-Mail-2--733827411 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Paul, first I want to say that I am not the expert. I have not yet completed building my own p port. The major difference between our p ports and those found in race cars is that our engines are limited to 7500 rpm (or in my case to 6000 rpm). These are very low rpm numbers for a p port. Never-the -less considerable power can be developed. Probably up to 250 hp @ 7500 rpm. I am hoping for 220 hp at 6000 rpm which is more power than my Tailwind will ever need. It is my understanding after talking to a lot of people that at our rpms you can leave the exhaust port stock with the splitters installed.=20 Like Buly said, close off all the stock intake passages with epoxy. =20= Jerry On Saturday, March 12, 2005, at 09:57 PM, Paul wrote: ArialHi, all....I need to make an inquiry regarding peripheral ports.=A0 I understand that the housings get the round peripheral ports installed, and that the exhaust port is also modified to complete the P-Port modification to the rotor housings. Arial=A0=A0=A0=A0 What, if anything = needs to be done to the existing center and end plates?=A0 If I purchase a set of p-ported housings, can I use the e-shaft and rotors from either my 1989 4-port turbo engine with it's 9.0 compression rotors, or the e-shaft and rotors from my 1988 NA 6-port engine with it's 9.4 compression rotors?=A0 Or would I be better off using the street-ported 4-port center and end plates? I asked Paul Lamar, but I didn't understand his short answer.=A0 He mentioned epoxy, but is that for the p-port housings or do you block off the ports in the front, rear and center plates that have the triangular ports in them?=A0 Thanks in advance for all replies.=A0 Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the internals of this engine, and how the stock porting works (or doesen't work) with peripheral ports.=A0=A0 Paul Conner =A0 = --Apple-Mail-2--733827411--