Return-Path: Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 790851 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:08:29 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.164; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.74]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868A23641C9 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164]) by filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.74]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20656-22 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-89-39.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.89.39]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7918364069 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4233844F.5070902@frontiernet.net> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:07:43 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Smaller Alternator References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0510-1, 03/11/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net And they're both 30 bucks on a wreck yard shelf, can be capacity tested free and be rebuilt for another $30 or $40 if they need it. I've concluded that I've no need for anything but N-D alternators, and no need to buy them at a store. Aside from Paul, I don't recall ever having known one to fail. ... Jim S. Paul wrote: > Hi, Steve... unfortunately, I did not weigh the Geo alternator, but it > is definately smaller and lighter (probably by about 1/3 lighter). > After having my stock Mazda alternator fail because the plastic inside > broke and the screw got jammed into the field windings, then having it > rebuilt by the local alternator rebuilder who said the insides were > cheap and poorly constructed, I decided to give it another try. Two > weeks later, the alternator started overcharging. That was it's last > chance. Two strikes and you're out. > The Geo alternator looks identical, even the casting has the same > number of vent holes, same mounting tabs, same connector plug, etc. A > carbon copy except for it's size. I wouldn't be surprised that they > are both from the same manufacturer. Paul Conner > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Brooks" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 7:30 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Smaller Alternator > > >> Paul, >> >> Very nice. I'd heard before that t was [possible to >> mount the Geo alternator on the 13B, but I hadn't ever >> obtained one. I also "feel" that the Mazda is more >> reliable, but that is just based on knowing how GM >> cuts corner, especially on low end cars. >> >> I'm curious if you weighed the stock alternator, and >> the Geo, to see how much weight difference there is. >> I'd be prone to change just for the weight loss. 55 >> amps would be more than enough. I've never seen more >> than about 40 amps after start, and that is just for a >> few seconds. Normal running current seems to be in >> the 13 amp range, with just engine and GPS/Comm. >> CUT by Paul Conner >> > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > >