Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 790061 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:29:14 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.116; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.60 ([204.127.135.60]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2005031205282911200rh344e>; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 05:28:29 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.94] by 204.127.135.60; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 05:28:28 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: FW: Bellhousing Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 05:28:28 +0000 Message-Id: <031220050528.22547.42327DFC000AE301000058132160383116019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 18 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22547_1110605308_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22547_1110605308_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- Subject: Bellhousing Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 04:34:27 +0000 > > > > Cool George. For the new people this fits Tracy's gear box. > > > > Don't panic on the weight people. Just cut or machine away what > > > > you don't need. Looks like the starter will go on either side. > > > Beautiful George !! Will be waiting to hear when they are > available !! > > > > > Kelly Troyer > > Kelly, > > Hang in there a little longer Kelly, we have to do this right. > > There may be a more weight to come off than I imagine - there is a lot of > extra to accommodate the machining protocol . These extra bits provide > strengthening and support, so as to eliminate flexing caused by hold down > bolts etc. > > Paul, I have been discussing distribution with Butch, as after sending the > original prototype to Chris Cosman, I realise the ( one off)postage costs > are expensive. The only way around this is volume by sea freight. > > I feel sure there would be a demand of a couple of hundred over the next 2 > or 3 years. I'm crunching the numbers to see if a up-front investment (in a > steel die) would be better value for everyone. > Butch said he would consider an investment of this type and manage the US > distribution from his end. Needless to say we are working on distribution > and costs. > > George (down under) Attachment 1: Bell-house-casting-3-10-05.jpg --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22547_1110605308_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
Subject: Bellhousing
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 04:34:27 +0000



> > > > Cool George. For the new people this fits Tracy's gear box.
> > > > Don't panic on the weight people. Just cut or machine away what
> > > > you don't need. Looks like the starter will go on either side. 

> > > Beautiful George !! Will be waiting to hear when they are
> available !!
> >
> > > Kelly Troyer
>
> Kelly,
>
> Hang in there a little longer Kelly, we have to do this right.
>
> There may be a more weight to come off than I imagine - there is a lot of
> extra to accommodate the machining protocol . These extra bits provide
> strengthening and support, so as to eliminate flexing caused by hold down
> bolts etc.
>
> Paul, I have been discussing distribution with Butch, as after sending the
> original prototype to Chris Cosman, I realise the ( one off)postage costs
> are expensive. The only way around this is volume by sea freight.
>
> I feel sure there would be a demand of a couple of hundred over the next 2
> or 3 years. I'm crunching the numbers to see if a up-front investment (in a
> steel die) would be better value for everyone.
> Butch said he would consider an investment of this type and manage the US
> distribution from his end. Needless to say we are working on distribution
> and costs.
>
> George (down under) 

        Attachment 1: Bell-house-casting-3-10-05.jpg
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22547_1110605308_0--