Return-Path: Received: from corpprd-pxy2.canfor.ca ([198.162.160.3] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 778631 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:45:21 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.162.160.3; envelope-from=Steve.Bartrim@canfor.com Received: from canformail1.canfor.ca (canformail1.canfor.ca [199.60.193.29]) by corpprd-pxy2.canfor.ca (Build 103 8.9.3p2/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09077 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:44:34 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C525B1.F790E7B8" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Heater valve Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:44:34 -0800 Message-ID: <091A2D42FAF91A41B84750D269FC97E72B312F@canformail1.canfor.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Heater valve Thread-Index: AcUlgRAfVaNcKW67Sku1GMrQ7Nu/cwALkRiA From: "Bartrim, Todd" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C525B1.F790E7B8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, I figured I'd get a bite on that one. Well for me it seemed easier considering I had all the materials required at my disposal. That and the way I plumbed the vent lines through the heater core to ensure that there is no cold air bypassing it (no cold drafts... unless I want it) Normally the separate boost pump would not be required if flying with a EDWP AND a thermostat OR if using an EWP in a warmer climate or if not doing loooong, power-off descents. To be honest I really didn't require it, but it was just so darn small and cute that I had to think of a reason to use it. =09 Easier to plumb, =20 =20 You're not getting away with this pal :-) So you're saying that it's easier to install a heater core, run hoses to it, install a valve, cables, etc, and let's not forget the separate boost pump and wiring. Yeah, that sounds waaaaaay easier :-) =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C525B1.F790E7B8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Yeah, I figured I'd get a bite on that one. = Well for me=20 it seemed easier considering I had all the materials required at my = disposal.=20 That and the way I plumbed the vent lines through the heater core = to ensure=20 that there is no cold air bypassing it (no cold drafts... unless I want=20 it)  Normally the separate boost pump would not be required if = flying=20 with a EDWP AND a thermostat OR if using an EWP in a warmer climate or = if not=20 doing loooong, power-off descents. To be honest I really didn't require = it, but=20 it was just so darn small and cute that I had to think of a reason to = use=20 it.
Easier to plumb,  
&nbs= p;
You're not getting away with this pal=20 :-)   So you're saying that it's easier to install a = heater=20 core, run hoses to it, install a valve, cables, etc, and let's = not forget=20 the separate boost pump and wiring.  Yeah, that = sounds waaaaaay=20 easier :-)  
  
------_=_NextPart_001_01C525B1.F790E7B8--