Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com
Message-ID: <000801c52455$a8602320$2402a8c0@edward2>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-776203@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New topic??  [FlyRotary] acetone ?
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:11:16 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Actually, Ernest, its a bit of both from my understanding.  But, I put most
of my money on Newton {:>) as I was never convinced that the air molecule on
top of the wing really knew it had to travel faster to meet its
below-the-wing partner at the same instant they both left the trailing edge.
I always wonder how it knew just how fast to go to do that - I mean who told
it, Bernoulli? {:>) and besides, seems to me it got the rotten end of the
deal having to go further and travel faster - just not fair.

Ed A
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ernest Christley" <echristley@nc.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:53 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: New topic?? [FlyRotary] acetone ?


> Ed Anderson wrote:
>
> > Well, since I was afeared to jump in the fray over shut-off valves and
> > EWPs, I just kept my mouth shut.  But, looks like its settling down
> > again. {:>).
>
>
>
> Heh, Ed.  Is it Bernoulli or Newton that keeps a plane in the air?
>
> Ernest (INCOMING!!)
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>