Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 775857 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:34:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j28MXekd026622 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:33:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001401c5242e$e51632e0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Tangential muffler Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:33:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine I like the concept, Jerry. And you are correct, I was referring to the VAM which just had an opening in front but not a tube. It was loud to me considering it was hooked up to an NA engine - would have been louder with a turbo block. Yes, I calculated that you need a minimum of six inch dia and 8 - 10" is better. Looking forward to reports on its performance. Ed A ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Hey" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tangential muffler > Ed, you are referring to the VAM which did not have a cooling tube, > just an open end. It was very loud, I understand. It was in > looking at the VAM that Ed Klepeis and I finally asked each other, what > if we weld a tube in there? We still think it is a good idea. The > large diameter is also important. The idea is that the exhaust gases > will lose heat and energy (sound) as they expand within the can. Also, > note the exit pipe (rectangular, 1.75 x 4) is has a much larger area > then the two 2" o.d. pipes coming out of the engine. The idea is to > create a completely free flowing exhaust in which the exhaust gases > become very disorganize as they expand and cool. Jerry > > > > > On Tuesday, March 8, 2005, at 03:50 PM, Ed Anderson wrote: > > > Well, I hope it works out. A somewhat similar muffler (although not as > > large in diameter) with a cooling tube has been tried. It was fired > > up at > > Tracy's, it is my opinion that the design failed to mute the exhaust > > very > > much. But, not certain how much the two designs have in common other > > than > > appearances. Seeing as the exhaust BTU is equivalent to approx twice > > the > > heat discharged through the radiators and mufflers together, it is my > > opinion, that its going to take a LOT of cooling air to make any > > difference > > in temps of the oven. However, I would love to see it work, I've got > > the > > room - just can't take the heat. {:>) > > > > > > Ed > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jerry Hey" > > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 3:33 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Tangential muffler > > > > > >> Thanks for your comment Ed. The cool tube is intended to extract a > >> lot of that heat and pump it overboard. We shall soon see if it > >> works > >> as Bob White will be running his engine soon. I got my fingers > >> crossed. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tuesday, March 8, 2005, at 03:17 PM, Ed Anderson wrote: > >> > >>> Jerry, Tracy Crook flew with a similar Tangential muffler for a > >>> number > >>> of > >>> hours. The neat thing is it does fit under the cowl and suppress > >>> sound > >>> nicely, the un-neat thing is it acts like a large oven under the cowl > >>> and > >>> keeps cowl temps highly elevated. I am fairly certain that is why > >>> Tracy > >>> removed it. > >>> > >>> Ed A > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Jerry Hey" > >>> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 3:01 PM > >>> Subject: [FlyRotary] Tangential muffler > >>> > >>> > >>>> From the "other" list comes the report that someone has tested a > >>>> similar exhaust system to what I have been building on his > >>>> PowerSport > >>>> p > >>>> ported engine. . He reports the muffler worked well to quiet the > >>>> exhaust note and that the engine seemed to breath freely. The neat > >>>> thing about this exhaust system is that it fits inside the cowl. > >>>> Here are a couple of photos showing the muffler on a Mustang 2. The > >>>> muffler is 6" o.d. x 10 inches long. Construction is 321 16 gage. > >>>> The cool tube running through the center is intended to cool the > >>>> exhaust gas. Fresh air is plumbed through it. The engine mount is > >>>> the S-beam. Jerry > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> -- > >>> ----- > >>> ---- > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> -- > >>> ----- > >>> ---- > >>> > >>> > >>>>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >>> > >> > >> > >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >> > > > > > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >