Return-Path: Received: from mail.theofficenet.com ([65.166.240.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with SMTP id 763418 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:16:10 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.166.240.5; envelope-from=jackoford@theofficenet.com Received: (qmail 17768 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2005 20:45:26 -0000 Received: from dpc691941229.direcpc.com (HELO jack) (69.19.41.229) by mail.theofficenet.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 20:45:26 -0000 Message-ID: <010a01c51dda$823e6390$0200a8c0@jack> From: "Jack Ford" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterr or not to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Cooling system update Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:14:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0105_01C51D97.6EA03EF0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C51D97.6EA03EF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's why we backflush radiators in cars. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mark R Steitle=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:41 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterr or not to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: = Cooling system update Ed,I'm with Tracy (use high quality glycol & distilled water), except = for some possible RTV that might break free and get stuck in one or more = of the radiator tubes. Seems a good backflush would remedy that. Next = time I have my cooling system apart I might take a peek inside the = radiator and see if there is anything blocking the tubes. Corrective = action would depend on what I find. It wouldn't take very many blocked = tubes to push some of us over the edge. Mark S. Perhaps we could = fashion a quickly removable filter and patch it into various systems for = a while just to check what it picks up. Like, I wouldn't have thought it possible to block up a whole damned = radiator ... Jim S. Ed A =20 >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C51D97.6EA03EF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's why we backflush radiators in=20 cars.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Mark R Steitle =
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 = 12:41=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Filterr or not=20 to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Cooling system update

Ed,
I=92m =
with Tracy (use high quality glycol & distilled water), except for =
some possible RTV that might break free and get stuck in one or more of =
the radiator tubes.  Seems a good backflush would remedy =
that.  Next time I have my cooling system apart I might take a peek =
inside the radiator and see if there is anything blocking the =
tubes.  Corrective action would depend on what I find.  It =
wouldn=92t take very many blocked tubes to push some of us over the =
edge.  
 
Mark S. 
     

Perhaps we could fashion a = quickly=20 removable filter and patch it into various systems for a while just to = check=20 what it picks up.
Like, I wouldn't have thought it possible to = block up a=20 whole damned radiator ... Jim = S.

 
Ed =
A
 
  =
 
  =

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

>>  Archive:   =
http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C51D97.6EA03EF0--