Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 763257 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:52:47 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2005 14:52:03 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1SJq01j009771 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:52:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42237660.4070401@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:52:00 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterr or not to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Cooling system update References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim Sower wrote: > Perhaps we could fashion a quickly removable filter and patch it into > various systems for a while just to check what it picks up. > Like, I wouldn't have thought it possible to block up a whole damned > radiator ... Jim S. I had already planned on a swirl pot to remove air bubbles. If the outlet of the pot stuck into the container a short distance and was not placed at the very bottom, it would act like one of those vortex vacuum cleaners. The heavy dirt and trash would be pushed to the side and eventually fall to the bottom. The light stuff will stay in the middle and eventually float to the top. A screw cap and a wet/dry vac make inspection and cleaning easy. Would such a system have to be overly large to actually work?