Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com ([64.136.20.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with SMTP id 762547 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:32:56 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.20.164; envelope-from=jbker@juno.com Received: from webmail33.nyc.untd.com (webmail33.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.173]) by smtpout05.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABBCGHLJAG5L2U2 for (sender ); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:31:52 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: Y+Mfppm2QyGfnY/dq+iW1Q+yRvcW2HERcQyEUPU4AnO1icQ6hefguA== Received: (from jbker@juno.com) by webmail33.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KLW9NZV5; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:31:15 PST Received: from [4.234.27.154] by webmail33.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:30:30 GMT X-Originating-IP: [4.234.27.154] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jbker@juno.com" Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:30:30 GMT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: injector life and reliability X-Mailer: WebMail Version 2.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20050228.053115.14013.236996@webmail33.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 2:3:432347353 Here is a comment from the TWM site that Rusty suggested: Most peak and hold drivers will drive both high and low resistance injectors but, under no circumstances, should peak and hold injectors be driven with saturated drivers. I mistakenly ran short time without 5 ohm ballaster resistor in line with P&H injectors. Wonder if I killed their life? My used injectors that came with Bruce's package were cleaned and flowed before mistaken running. One died shortly and I replaced with a rebuilt auto store one. Now I believe another was has an anomally. Yuk! Should I trade them all out before I fly? Makes me glad that I put the injector disable switches in and have 2 per rotor. Bernie