Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17961
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:08:51 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
IIRC EWP is a lot more efficient than EDWP (absorbs much less power).  Dual EWPs make the system a couple of orders of magnitude more reliable than single EWP and arguably single EDWP.

A bullet proof electrical system makes EWP very attractive to me ... Jim S.

William wrote:
Message
Your comment below implies that an EWP is *more* reliable than a belt. I don't think that has been shown to be the case yet.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
With an alternator driven by the e-shaft and an EWP, I could have an engine that required no belts.  I REALLY like that idea.   Did I say I REALLY like that idea?  Paul Conner

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster