Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17952
From: William <wschertz@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: E-shaft permanent magnet alternator
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:37:41 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Your comment below implies that an EWP is *more* reliable than a belt. I don't think that has been shown to be the case yet.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
With an alternator driven by the e-shaft and an EWP, I could have an engine that required no belts.  I REALLY like that idea.   Did I say I REALLY like that idea?  Paul Conner

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster