Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #17807
From: Herb Sanders <hsanders@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:56:41 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock

Since Paul was able to duplicate the problem with the Facet in the line and the 3/16 od vent line installed, and was NOT able to duplicate the problem when he removed the Facet from the system, I would interpret that (1) The vent line is not large enough to vent in that particular situation and (2) The Facet pump is not necessary and perhaps even in the way.

 

Paul, I know you will stay with it until you feel comfortable, but if you leave the pump in the system (a proven problem), I would like to see you go to at least a 3/8 od vent line.

Herb

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bartrim, Todd
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:30 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock

 

Hi Paul;

    I'd suggest that now that you have the vent tube, you really aren't concerned whether the Facet pump will allow backflow. As a matter of fact I 'd even suggest that I wouldn't want it, but I'd certainly want the ability to pump it forward to force cool fuel into the header tank, thereby forcing any possible vapour back through the vent line. I don't have any problems drawing fuel through my Facet pumps and I wouldn't be without them.

 

Just my 2 bits

Todd

 


 

Thanks for the info, Tracy.  My only concern is this....if the Facet pump was not involved, might it be better to have it back in the system so that if I have a future problem, I could turn the Facet pump on to pressurize the sump tank with fresh fuel?  Ed seems to be comfortable with this, and has had to use it.

      

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster