Return-Path: Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 755178 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:18:07 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=sqpilot@bellsouth.net Received: from [216.78.114.104] by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050223001722.CDEY2276.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[216.78.114.104]> for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:17:22 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [266.4.0]); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:17:17 -0600 Message-ID: <006a01c5193d$0779f620$68724ed8@paul52u7f5qyav> From: "Paul" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd battery Re: Amps required to run engine &- hours available Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:17:15 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original For my personal preferences, just go have an alternator that was not belt driven would be great. I don't like the thought of a belt braking and possibly damaging my raadiator, radiator hoses, oil cooler, oil hoses, spark plug wires, ignition coil wires, firewall mounted control mechanisms, etc. Even if I only had one alternator, but it was not belt driven, I would call that a great improvement. Paul Conner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:33 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd battery Re: Amps required to run engine &- hours available Bill, OK, now you've got my interest! A crank mounted alternator could make a great backup power source. So, why can't we come up with a simple method of mounting a PM alternator, or 55 amp ND, on the end of the crankshaft? That shouldn't be too hard to do. (easy for me to say) I went with the Aero-Electric Z-14 approach (two alts, two batteries). I rationalize that chances are slim that both alts will quit on the same flight, unless I break a belt and it takes out the second belt. If I lose both alternators, then reserve battery power (dual Odyssey 680's) will be used to get me to a safe landing site. The plan is to replace the belts at every annual. Biggest worry is engine overheating & seizing due to loss of water pump. An EWP would fix that. Mark I believe they have also done crankshaft pulley alternators. Bill Jepson >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005