Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.170] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 754995 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:30:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.170; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd battery Re: Amps required to run engine&- hours available Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:29:52 -0600 Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69EC07FA9@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd battery Re: Amps required to run engine&- hours available Thread-Index: AcUZLbQfTaTb5ySoRbWe+OJt/nPqEAAACg6g From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" I think the early Goldwings used a stator. That could hold some possibilities. I'll look tonight. =20 Mark S. > That's not the one I was considering earlier. It was definitely a=20 Harley unit, and resembled the Racemate setup (a bolted down stator with a can over the top. The closest I could find with a quick search of the Goldwing was the G106, but that was just the stator. >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html